1682、“于是所多玛王、蛾摩拉王、押玛王、洗扁王和比拉（就是琐珥）王，都出来”表示普遍掌权的邪恶和虚假。这从前面（14:2；1663节）关于这些王所说的清楚可知，即：他们是指邪恶的欲望和虚假的说服。在那一节，这些王表示总体上一切邪恶和一切虚假，或也可说，邪恶的欲望和虚假的说服；因此，经上说与他们交战。之后的主题则转向与利乏音人、苏西人、以米人，以及亚玛力人和亚摩利人交战；最后是与一开始提到的那些王交战。所以这些王在此仅表示属于较低等级的掌权的邪恶和虚假。
New Century Edition
Cooper(2008,2013)
[NCE]1682. The king of Sodom, and the king of Gomorrah, and the king of Admah, and the king of Zeboiim, and the king of Bela (which is Zoar), went out symbolizes the evil and falsity that were in general control. This can be seen from remarks above at verse 2 concerning these kings, identifying them with evil cravings and false convictions [1663]. At that point, these monarchs as a group symbolized all evil and all falsity or, to put it another way, evil cravings and false persuasions, which is why that verse said that war was made with them. Afterward the text deals with war against the Rephaim, Zuzim, Emim, and Horites, then against the Amalekite and Amorite, and finally against these same kings, named at the start. As a result, in the current verse they symbolize simply the prevailing evil and falsity, which are less serious.
Potts(1905-1910) 1682
1682. There went out the king of Sodom, and the king of Gomorrah, and the king of Admah, and the king of Zeboiim, and the king of Bela, this is Zoar. That these signify the evils and falsities that reign generally, is evident from what was said above, at verse 2, concerning these kings, namely, that they are cupidities of evil and persuasions of falsity. In that verse by the same kings are signified all evils and all falsities in general, or what is the same, cupidities of evil and persuasions of falsity, and therefore it is said that war was made with them. Afterwards the war with the Rephaim, Zuzim, Emim, and Horites, was treated of; also the war with the Amalekite and the Amorite; and finally with these kings who were named in the beginning. Here therefore by the same kings are signified only the reigning evils and falsities that are of a less degree.
Elliott(1983-1999) 1682
1682. 'The king of Sodom went out, and the king of Gomorrah, and the king of Admah, and the king of Zeboiim, and the king of Bela, that is, Zoar' means evils and falsities which reign generally. This is clear from what was stated above at verse 2 about the same kings being evil desires and false persuasions. In that place those same kings meant all evils and all falsities in general, or what amounts to the same, evil desires and false persuasions, and therefore it was said that war was made with them. The subject after that turned to war with the Rephaim, Zuzim, Emim, and Horites, and also with the Amalekites and Amorites, and finally with these kings who were named at the beginning. Here therefore these same kings mean solely the reigning evils and falsities that belong to a lower degree.
Latin(1748-1756) 1682
1682. 'Exivit rex Sodomae, et rex Amorae, et rex Admae, et rex Zeboiim, et rex Belae, haec Zoar': quod significent mala et falsa communiter regnantia, constat ab illis quae dicta supra ad vers. 2 de iisdem quod sint cupiditates mali et persuasiones falsi; ibi in genere per eosdem reges significata sunt omnia mala et omnia falsa, seu quod idem est, cupiditates mali et persuasiones falsi, quare dictum quod 'cum illis bellum factum'; postea agitur de bello cum Rephaim, Zuzimis, Emim, et Horitis; tum cum Amalekita et Emoraeo, demum cum his regibus, qui principio nominati sunt, hic ideo per eosdem reges significantur solum mala et falsa regnantia, quae sunt minoris gradus.