上一节  下一节  回首页


《新教会教义纲要》 第22节

(道宏、一滴水译本 2022)

  BE22.简要分析:上述四点——今时在更正教中被广为流传——并不是什么新东西,也不是三位改教领军人物最先提出来的,而自尼西亚会议时期传承,会后由制订者们教导,并在天主教中因此被保存下来,这个事实可从关于教会史的著述中明显看到。天主教和更正教在三位一体的教义上保持一致,是因为他们都承认三大信经——《使徒信经》、《尼西亚信经》和《亚他那修信经》,其中教导这样的三一。关于他们一致接受基督功德的归算,从前文对《特兰托会议信纲》的引文(n.3-8)与《协和信条》的引文(n.10-15)相比便可看出。关于他们在称义方面的一致性接下来讨论。


上一节  目录  下一节


A Brief Exposition of New Church Doctrine (Stanley translation 1953) 22

22. BRIEF ANALYSIS

The four articles mentioned above, as at present taught in the Reformed Churches, were not new, nor were they first hatched by those three leaders, but were handed down from the time of the Council of Nicaea, and by writers after that period, and preserved from that time in the Roman Catholic Church, as is clear from books on Ecclesiastical History. Why the Roman Catholics and the Reformed agree regarding the article on the Trinity of Persons in the Godhead is because they both acknowledge the three creeds, the Apostles', the Nicene and the Athanasian, in which a Trinity is taught. That they agree on the article concerning the Imputation of Christ's merit, is plain from the extracts from the Council of Trent, nos. 13-18, compared with those from the Formula Concordiae, nos. 10-15. That they also agree on the article concerning Justification shall now be shown.

A Brief Exposition of New Church Doctrine (Whitehead translation 1892) 22

22. BRIEF ANALYSIS.

That the four articles above mentioned, as at present taught in the churches of the Reformed were not new, and first broached by those three leaders, but were handed down from the time of the Council of Nice, and taught by the writers after that period, and thus preserved in the Roman Catholic church, is evident from the books of ecclesiastical history. The reason why the Roman Catholics and the Reformed agree in the article of a Trinity of Persons in the Divinity, is, because they both acknowledge the three creeds, the Apostles', the Nicene, and the Athanasian, in which a Trinity is taught. That they agree in the article of the imputation of the merit of Christ, is evident from the extracts from the Council of Trent (n. 3-8) compared with those from The Formula Concordiae (n. 10-15). Their agreement in the article of justification shall now be the subject of discussion.

Summaria Expositio 22 (original Latin 1769)

22. BREVIS ANALYSIS.

Quod Quatuor supra nominati Articuli, sicut hodie docentur in Ecclesiis Reformatis, non fuerint novi, et a Tribus Antesignanis illis primum excusi, sed quod fuerint usque a tempore Concilii Nicaeni, et Scriptoribus post illud, traditi, et inde in Ecclesia Romano-Catholica conservati, ex libris Historiae Ecclesiasticae patet. Quod Romano Catholici ac Reformati concordent in Articulo de Trinitate Personarum in Divinitate, est quia utrinque agnoscuntur Tria Symbola, Apostolicum, Nicaenum, et Athanasianum, in quibus Trinitas docetur. Quod concordent in Articulo de Imputatione meriti Christi, patet ex desumptis e Synodo Tridentina n. 3-8 collatis cum desumptis ex Formula Concordiae, n. 10-15. Quod etiam in Articulo de Justificatione, nunc ventilationi subjicietur.


上一节  目录  下一节